|
Where do the 2.7 gig g5's sit in relation to the best in the pc world. Are they being left behind. I need a new PM but can't bring myself to buy one when all the signs, ( or rumors ) point to dual core. Are the 2.7 gig PM's old technology now ?
|
quote |
Member
|
ok... just for the record... a single Dual-core processor is NOT as fast as a Dual processor configuration... why? in a dual-core configuration, 2 cores are SHARING cache and bandwidth... which would slow performance as the processor load increased
in the case with 2 SEPARATE processors, they have their own dedicated bus, so they would handle heavy load better ALSO, the Pentium D is a very bad design, Intel knows this, AMD knows this, the better of the 2 is actually the X2 and Dual-core Opteron due to it's onchip memory controller, lowering overal latency, but it's STILL not as fast as a dual (physical) processor configuration dual-core is infact the cheap solution... why? you don't need as much materials, as you would to make 2 separate processors |
quote |
ಠ_ರೃ
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
FYI, the G5 does not have an onboard memory controller either. AMD is really #1 for 64-bit processors (or really, high end processors in general).
|
quote |
Posting Rules | Navigation |
|
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dual core Power Macs, specs? | jcampa | Speculation and Rumors | 2 | 2005-09-16 16:40 |
Purchase Advice (replacing dual G4; buy a dual G5 now or wait for Intel?) | del-uks | Purchasing Advice | 4 | 2005-08-10 14:50 |
OMG 970MP Dual Core G5 Official!!1!! | chaos123x | Speculation and Rumors | 115 | 2005-08-05 22:11 |
reason why you saw no dual core. | jkloos | Speculation and Rumors | 42 | 2005-05-02 10:46 |
Intel announces dual core chips | FallenFromTheTree | Speculation and Rumors | 16 | 2005-03-10 07:20 |