Veteran Member
|
So my landlady was contemplating moving off her MVNO based phone provider to Verizon and was asking me about
the iPhone. Her boyfriend has an iPhone and they wanted to Facetime and message each other. Well she just walked in with a Verizon bag and a HTC Rezound. Evidently they made the Rezound sound like a world beater. Even hyped up the Beats by Dre audio. It's not a bad looking phone but going through the UI IMO is just a mess. I didn't want to say anything negative because it's light years ahead of her former phone but sheesh Verizon hyping up a 6 month Android phone like it's a Galaxy SIII is a bit disturbing. One thing I do like about the iPhone is that it pretty much earned its success rather than been carrier driven. I don't have hatred for Android but by and large it "is" a carrier driven platform. omgwtfbbq |
quote |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
|
Talking about "carrier driven", why is it that carriers advertise Android phones so heavily in comparison to the iPhone? I must assume that they get much bigger margins. Is that assumption correct?
When there's an eel in the lake that's as long as a snake that's a moray. |
quote |
Formerly “AWM”
Join Date: May 2009
|
Not too shocked they pushed her towards an LTE device. Razr Maxx would have been a better choice in my opinion. A lot of these phones come with almost every widget available running. And HTC Sense ones are generally over the top ridiculous. Once you get rid of them it should be better. I think it's going to 4.0 this month too.
|
quote |
Less than Stellar Member
|
She should just take it back now before the frustration sets in and it's too late.
|
quote |
Space Pirate
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta
|
Chinney I read an article recently which described how much AT&T lost with every iPhone, and how the Android units were actively being pushed by that carrier.
... |
quote |
Formerly Roboman, still
awesome Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, OR
|
Ugh, going with Android is one thing, but even among Android phones, the Rezound was like the most gimmicky, flash-in-the-pan, gotta-sell-something-for-the-holidays phone ever. It's very much last year's model for this year's price, and last year's HTCs weren't even that great. Even just among HTCs, the HTC One series already feels like two years newer — much better build quality, less obtrusive Sense, and Android 4.0. The Rezound feels like, well, the iPhone 3G to the One's iPhone 4.
The Rhyme (Verizon's other holiday HTC) at least came with a more unique form factor and accessories. The Rezound is just...well, it's a warmed-over Sensation, which is in turn a warmed-over Evo. It's very much the last "hurrah" of their previous-generation, circa-2010 design language. But it has Beats Audio. So. and i guess i've known it all along / the truth is, you have to be soft to be strong |
quote |
Formerly Roboman, still
awesome Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, OR
|
The screen on the RAZR and RAZR MAXX is pretty bad, though. The Rezound has a higher-resolution display, and more importantly, it's an RGB "Super LCD" instead of an RGBG (PenTile) AMOLED.
and i guess i've known it all along / the truth is, you have to be soft to be strong |
quote |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
|
Another reason for carriers to push Android phones, and one I see all the time in Canada, where the iPhone is available on pretty much every carrier: exclusivity.
If I walk into a carrier's shop and they really sell me on buying an iPhone, I'm going to turn around and walk out to comparison shop, because I know I can get an iPhone anywhere, and possibly with a better deal on the plan. Of course, by the time I've been into 3 or 4 stores, I'll just go with the last one anyway, because I'm tired of looking around and want instant gratification. If I'm convinced that I must have an Android phone, the odds are the phone they sold me on is exclusive to that carrier, so to get it I sign up on the spot. As soon as the iPhone went to Telus and Bell here, and Rogers/Fido lost exclusivity, Rogers/Fido stores lost any interest in actively selling it. |
quote |
Yarp
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Road Warrior
|
I know a handful of people who got the Rezound. I think it was pretty heavily pushed and the deals were abundant for it. Case in point, I know one family that upgraded all of their iPhones to Rezounds basically for free. It might not be a good phone, but I think if it is still works as a phone then that's kind of all that matters for some.
|
quote |
Veteran Member
|
This was far from free. $199.
I did like the screen on the Rezound but HTC's Sense UI is a mess. It just came to light that not even Google is making money on Android and it's clear why when your phone is being given away. omgwtfbbq |
quote |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
|
Quote:
It is interesting to speculate on how this is all going to play out in the long run. When there's an eel in the lake that's as long as a snake that's a moray. Last edited by Chinney : 2012-05-06 at 11:42. Reason: Minor correction |
|
quote |
Space Pirate
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta
|
http://www.slashgear.com/verizon-har...port-05226378/
Also: http://tablet.pcmag.com/?ref=297499&...04002%2C00.asp Sorry for janky link, they served it up weird to my pad. ... |
quote |
Formerly “AWM”
Join Date: May 2009
|
The iPhone does have a bigger subsidy than other phones. You can find an android phone with a similar list price but carriers negotiate discounts. They get none from Apple. It's a financial burden to carry. Just ask Sprint. It's also why USCC decided not to sell it.
And and as soon as there is an LTE iPhone there reps will recommend it. |
quote |
Veteran Member
|
Yeah I think it's primarily about the LTE. Verizon's LTE network here in the Seattle area isn't bad and clearly ahead of AT&T.
|
quote |
Lovable Bastard
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston-ish
|
It has nothing to do with LTE. Verizon hypes LTE because the iPhone doesn't have it. When the iPhone does have it they'll find something else to hype.
Why is iPhone poison to carriers? There are three main reasons. 1) Carriers have zero control over iPhone. They can't recover the subsidy through crapware. They can't skin it to differentiate it over the iPhone you get from the competing carrier across the street. There is no good answer to "why should I buy iPhone on carrier X instead of carrier Y?" 2) iPhone's subsidy is huge. Carriers make a lot more off Android phones than iPhones. iPhone really is lose-lose for carriers: either you have it and make less money off it than your other phones, or you don't have it and get thwomped by carriers that do. 3) iPhones work better, longer. Very few Android phones ship with the current version of Android. Most are lucky to get one update, much less continual updates. Conversely, all iPhones to date have been supported for a minimum of three years. Want the newest version of Android? Buy a new phone. Android is a carriers wet dream. A good enough OS being shipped by firms which are struggling to remain profitable. A big fat profit margin because the manufacturers compete on costs. They get outdated almost instantly which means more hardware sales. They are "open," which means more crapware, which means more profit. Who cares if Android is downright hostile to users? It's really their only choice outside iPhone (you hear that? It's the synchronous blood boiling of all seven Windows Phone fans) and there's profit to be had! The iPhone model pushes carriers closer to being dumb pipes that compete on network quality and price. It's expensive and time consuming to upgrade your network, and competing on price is the destroyer of profit margins everywhere. In a world where carriers are dumb pipes, the handset makers rule the roost, and that is Verizon's worst nightmare. iPhone represents everything the carriers don't want. Logic, logic, logic. Logic is the beginning of wisdom, Valeris, not the end. |
quote |
Mr. Vieira
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
|
True. My first iPhone in 2007 was nothing like my previous cell phone in any way...including the activation, what came in it, the needless complexity and AT&T branding and preinstalled nonsense.
Apple is doing it the way it should be done, and carriers - like the music, movie and TV industry - don't like it when their playpen gets peed in. Especially by outfits who "have no business" playing in that space. As many customers and users Apple has made happy over the years, they've surely pissed off just as many execs, sales and marketing personnel at the cell carriers, record companies and the rest. Good. Someone needs to drag these clowns into the 21st century and a more consumer-friendly way of going about things. |
quote |
Lovable Bastard
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston-ish
|
Yep. It's worth noting that Android would be nothing without the carriers. Android had just about zero traction until Verizon threw its weight behind it. Then Samsung came out with the Galaxy and it started to gain a lot of traction worldwide because of Samsung's numerous carrier relationships.
Logic, logic, logic. Logic is the beginning of wisdom, Valeris, not the end. Last edited by Kraetos : 2012-05-16 at 17:39. Reason: hadn't seen the stats recently |
quote |
Mr. Vieira
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
|
That's because it's a ridiculous, maddening piece of shit that nobody knows how/what to do with. You spend money on some "cutting edge", (this week's) hyped model and, out of the box, it's running an OS from a year or so ago and, you later find out, that's about as new or current as it's ever going to get because this version can't run on that device from that carrier because of this firmware and that whatever, blah, blah...
Who, fully aware of this sort of stuff, would purposely buy into that silliness? And even if you're not the kind of user who cares about that sort of thing, you're still setting yourself up for some level of aggravation or disappointment. Oh that's right, I forgot...it's "open"! Yes, and so is my fly when I take a pee... Say what you want about Apple, the iPhone and iOS...but when you buy one, you know you're not going to be "left behind" in a matter of months, or sit on last year's OS forever because of reasons completely out of your control and understanding. What it really boils down to is this: if I'm going to drop $199 or more on a device I use every single day (and more than any Mac I've ever owned), guess what? I like knowing that I'm in the pipe for any and all updates and enhancements for at least the next two years (probably more), with no ifs/ands/buts or stupid caveats/exceptions that I have no control or recourse over. Not to mention having a vibrant, thriving app and development (and accessory) community at my reach. Those are important to me, for the money/time involved, and only one outfit is offering that. So I choose accordingly, and in almost five years I've never once regretted or second-guessed myself. Last edited by psmith2.0 : 2012-05-16 at 17:11. |
quote |
Formerly “AWM”
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
I do agree about the iPhone subsidy but that will be dealt with either through negotiations with Apple or raising fees and rates on customers. It can't be dealt with by a few salesmen here and there. Plus I'm in these stores somewhat frequently to check out new phones and I still see reps automatically blurt out iPhone when a customer doesn't know what they want. |
|
quote |
Lovable Bastard
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston-ish
|
Every Verizon rep I've encountered (my old job required frequent interaction with them) either brazenly pushed the latest and greatest Droid, or they sheepishly recommended iPhone, as if they would get in trouble for doing so.
That was about 6 months ago. Is it different now? Was it different before? Because according to CNN, Verizon's stance is that iPhones are "outdated," and this echoes my personal experience, and I am not convinced Verizon will change their tune once an LTE iPhone comes out. (Never mind that most LTE phones run Android 2.3... yeah, not outdated at all...) Logic, logic, logic. Logic is the beginning of wisdom, Valeris, not the end. |
quote |
Mr. Vieira
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
|
I went to a Verizon store with a friend and her mom several months back. I'd never really been, and was just tagging along for the ride and all. But basically the people there recommended and pushed pretty much everything - including a tin can in the parking lot - that wasn't an iPhone.
They posters and signage were around, as were demo units of both the iPhone and iPad. So I assumed the joint wasn't entirely hostile to the product. But the two different reps we dealt with seemed borderline dickheaded when they saw my iPhone (and when my friend had her's out too). Naturally he pulls out his paperbook-sized something-or-other model and it just looks like a box of Crayons threw up all over the screen. And he kinda had that "I'm doing something simple but making it look complicated and 'heavy lifting' so I properly convey the seriousness of this phone, and how it's not for you Apple pussies out there. Real work, you see?" If I'd rolled my eyes any more, they would've popped out of my head... A friend of a friend of a friend did the same thing a while back, showing me his phone and the only real thing he could tout was "this screen's a lot bigger", and some ringtone acquisition. Yeah, I'm gonna go right out and chuck my iPhone so I can deal with ugly icons at 4.5" and download any Limp Korn ringtone I want! Uh, no. Smartphones have actually made people more stupid, ironically enough. Is that how it works? Are they actually zapping our brains and sucking our intelligence out, little by little? Because I swear, as a culture, we're getting dumber by the week...but these $99 phones can launch/control a NASA mission FFS. It kinda terrifies me if I stop long enough to think about it. |
quote |
Formerly “AWM”
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
I doubt Apple gives a crap about any carrier trying to openly hype a competing product over the iPhone. The biggest threat to them right now is any assault on the subsidy model. |
|
quote |
Space Pirate
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta
|
Hey, this has been bugging me.... can we change the word "steering" in this thread title into "steered"?
ta ... |
quote |
Less than Stellar Member
|
|
quote |
Veteran Member
|
Please change it. I groaned when I saw the typo.
|
quote |
Lovable Bastard
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston-ish
|
I mean... they are definitely discouraging iPhone... there it is, in plain language, in a national newspaper: iPhone is outdated.
|
quote |
Formerly “AWM”
Join Date: May 2009
|
From the article...
Quote:
I have my personal line from Sprint who has the absolute worst data speeds in the country. I usually get around 200 -300 kb/s and I've seen ping times as high as 1000ms. Why would I ever get an iPhone with them at this point? But that's all they shove down your throat at their stores. Carriers spent years pushing the iPhone as the only choice. Nobody complained about that. Now they aren't doing that anymore. If people don't want to be offered any choices maybe they should go to the Apple store to make their purchase. |
|
quote |
careful with axes
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hillsborough, CA
|
Your landlady had a chance to own a Lamborghini instead of an HTC
http://phandroid.com/2012/06/09/lamb...rocodile-skin/ Wait, is that a Lamborghini phone or a Cardassian tricorder? I'm really not sure... Also...Android 2.3, f-yeah. |
quote |
Yarp
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Road Warrior
|
Speaking of Android. Where are they? I was doing a lot of traveling this past week. Several airports and hotels, a few major cities, crowded public areas where people are standing around using their phones a lot, is the point. While I obviously didn't take specific count of the devices I saw or how it compares to the amount of people I saw. I still feel pretty confident saying that, of what I saw the overwhelming majority was iPhones, to a degree that the 'non-iPhone' devices are almost not even worth mentioning.
It was like this at every airport terminal, every hotel, every plane and every venue. I'm not about to say that the Android marketshare stats are bogus or anything but it is weird is all because Android's marketshare lead _is_ pretty substantial to the degree where you really think you'd be seeing them 'in the wild' more frequently than you do iPhones. I think maybe Android users just don't idly sit around playing with their phones as much as iPhone users? (which actually might have some merit to it given the big gap in mobile browser and app usage between the platforms). Seems like that might be the case if most Android users basically don't even use their phones as smartphones that you'd be less likely to see them 'out' while people are sitting around killing time. |
quote |
careful with axes
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hillsborough, CA
|
I don't actively go out looking for Android phones, but the guy sitting beside me at a Prometheus screening was using some sort of Android phone.
Your last assumption is basically true. iOS user session time dominates Android's. This of course has a major impact on app downloads and ad impressions. So not only do devs hate the fragmentation in the Android "ecosystem," but its users are less active as well. |
quote |
Posting Rules | Navigation |
|
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Android Thread | Partial | General Discussion | 224 | 2013-01-13 19:11 |
Android App Thread | onlyafterdark | Third-Party Products | 45 | 2010-07-29 17:06 |
iPhone vs. Android | ezkcdude | General Discussion | 189 | 2010-02-27 06:44 |
Android as an OS...good or bad? | Satchmo | Third-Party Products | 7 | 2009-04-02 04:14 |
How do I deal with a stubborn landlady? | Luca | AppleOutsider | 21 | 2004-09-06 12:01 |