|
meh
Join Date: May 2004
|
The Chevy Camaro is back! At least in concept. I am sure though GM will get enough attention to the Camaro, and build it. I like it better then the Mustang and coming Dodge Challenger. Its design cues come from the '69 Camaro.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=3124 ![]() giggity |
|
|
quote |
|
Travels via TARDIS
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Earthsea
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
quote |
|
meh
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
giggity |
|
|
|
quote |
|
Travels via TARDIS
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Earthsea
|
Quote:
Sports cars are always neat to show off... I just can't imagine paying to purchase, maintain, and fuel one. To each his own. ![]() Apparently I call the cops when I see people litter. |
|
|
|
quote |
|
meh
Join Date: May 2004
|
Apparently that GM yelled at R&T and the link with the video was removed. Expect it to be relaunched by Monday.
|
|
|
quote |
|
Mariska's monkey
Join Date: May 2004
|
At the recent Detroit Auto Show, Dodge showed a modern Challenger concept.
All these companies, the past few years, are doing the time machine thing, huh? Some of them work (that Camaro isn't too bad). But some of them aren't so good. A real retro trend at play, the past several years: PT Cruiser, Ford's T-Bird (now gone), the rebirth of the Beetle, the Mini Cooper, the Prowler and then new cars that are meant to evoke a sort of 50's/retro vibe, like that weird Chevy truck/car thing (can't remember the name, but you know what I'm talking about). Oh, and not to forget the new Mustang, which is the first modern Mustang design that I've actually liked (I've hated Mustangs since the 80's). But I like the looks of the current one. The Dodge Challenger concept was interesting. Also, Dodge brought back the Charger too (but it's not as hot-rod or muscle as one would expect...almost looks Taurus-y). ![]() Everything old is new again...just takes 20-30 years for its coolness to cycle back around and be "rediscovered", that's all. |
|
|
quote |
|
meh
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
The Challenger is too retro for my taste, but I think it will sell well, even though it is predicted to start at $28K. ![]() giggity |
|
|
|
quote |
|
meh
Join Date: May 2004
|
Here is the video that was attached to the link I posted above. The link for the video is under the pic of the car.
http://www.srtforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=209846 giggity |
|
|
quote |
|
Formerly Roboman, still
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: on twitter! @werejack
|
I can't tell if Pscates was talking about the SSR (a weird retro convertible pickup) or the HHR (a crossover that shares the same designer as the PT Crusier, and it shows) but those are both notable "retro" cars.
Nobody has mentioned the Chrysler Crossfire. It's not a bad car (it's basically a Mercedes-Benz SL350 with cooler styling and $10k off the purchase price), but it's not selling to well, apparently, as it's days are alledgedly numbered. VW had an awesome "New Microbus" concept that floated around for a few years, but they decided that it would be less risky to build another boring boxy Eurovan. Paralasys like that is the reason VW is in a financial hole to begin with - I guarantee that the New Microbus concept would have sold more than the Eurovan, but rather than designing an auto that everybody would want to drive, they decided to make an auto that a select few would have to drive. And now they're ditching the Eurovan to make a new minivan with Chrysler. Do you hear that, VW? It's the sound of a missed opportunity. Personally, I love this retro movement. The Mini Cooper and the Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler are two of my favorite cars ever. cue the lights and dim the stars |
|
|
quote |
|
Member
|
I liked this camaro concept better
![]() ![]() but that new one looks nice. |
|
|
quote |
|
ಠ_ರೃ
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
Quag, you seem to like everything GM does so I'm not surprised you like the styling of the HHR. Personally I don't think I've ever seen an uglier car. And while the new Challenger concept is a bit over-the-top, I do like it. Also, concept cars tend to have crazier styling than the final product.
The problem now is that none of the regions seem to offer quite what I'm looking for in a car... European cars are now by far the least reliable, having taken a nosedive in the last 5-10 years. Japanese cars have never been particularly exciting but these days they're even more boring than ever. Toyota, for example, has discontinued the Supra, Celica, and MR2. And American cars... well, they're promising, but they still lack refinement and it seems like you can't even get a bloody manual transmission in them anymore. And there are too many SUVs... I mean, there's even a Porsche SUV! |
|
|
quote |
|
meh
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
giggity |
|
|
|
quote |
|
Mariska's monkey
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
I follow cars about as much as I do sports. ![]() |
|
|
|
quote |
|
Formerly Roboman, still
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: on twitter! @werejack
|
The Camaro Concept is a case where I absolutely hated the original car (I am NOT a muscle car guy) but I like the concept, and would probably like it a lot more if not for the connection with said muscle car.
I love sharp, edgy, low-slung cars. I love the Cadillac XLR - for its styling, if for nothing else. I don't like the front of the Camaro Concept (simply because I'm not a muscle car guy), nor the rear (ditto), but I love the profile. I wish more modern cars, less encumbered by retro chains, would go for the low-slung Batmobile look. Within reason (see: Mercedes SLR). ![]() cue the lights and dim the stars |
|
|
quote |
|
Senior Member
|
I'm not sure why the muscle car craze has once again hit Detroit, especially with fuel prices going they way they have been. Insurance and gas killed the first era of muscle cars. I think this 'revival' is both a way that the current companies can target both the aging boomers and the younger generations that fondly drool over cars like the Dart and the GTO.
Now I admit, GM's design team has been getting several things right (XLR, CTS, CTS-V, C6, Z06, Solstice/Sky) but all of those cars have been more 'specialty' cars with the exception of the CTS. GM needs to move it's styling down into the more mainstream lines. Most car designs today are pretty uninspired, and bland. The Cobalt is a good example. It's a decent car, but if you look at in profile, it's rear-end sticks up really high. Same with the focus and others. Whoever thought that was a good design needs to go back to styling school. Now I know that those are supposed to be low-end cheap cars, but that doesn't mean that it needs to look like crap. I agree with Roboman in my love of low-slung cars, drop the rear-ends down, make the cars look slightly more aggressive, and I think you have a car that has broad appeal. "It's a good thing there's no law against a company having a monopoly of good ideas. Otherwise Apple would be in deep yogurt..." -Apple Press Release |
|
|
quote |
|
ಠ_ರೃ
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
Maybe it's because cars have recently become so boring? When everything out there is designed to be fuel-efficient and practical, a few people are naturally going to want a big-engined, RWD car with some major pick-up.
Sports cars seem to be going by the wayside in favor of two things: Muscle cars (V6 or V8 with RWD, lots and lots of torque and power) and sport compact cars (higher-powered versions of 4-cylinder FWD small cars). Look at how many of the latter there are: Chevy Cobalt SS Ford Focus SVT Dodge Neon SRT-4 Toyota Corolla S Honda Civic Si Acura RSX Type-S Nissan Sentra SE-R Mazda Protege Mazdaspeed Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Subaru Impreza WRX Volkswagen Golf GTI They're all FWD (or sometimes AWD), which hurts their handling, but at the same time they're also based on small cars. All of them are lightweight, fairly practical, and they are pretty powerful for their size too. Most of the cars I listed produce around 180-200 hp, with the Impreza and the Lancer doing closer to 240 with their turbochargers. There are probably more that I missed. How many of the above manufacturers also make affordable sports cars? Not many... the ones that do make sports cars (and that's not all of them) usually don't make them in roughly the same price range as their sport compacts. Old cars like the Ford Probe, Toyota Celica, and Mitsubishi Eclipse are less popular because the same performance can be achieved from a much more practical 4-door platform. So the only sports cars you see are either muscle cars or the higher-end ones like the Corvette and the Ford GT. A lot of people say that sports cars are dead or dying, but I say they've just changed form. There will always be people who want something quick and fun to drive, but you don't have to use a low 2-door coupe to satisfy them. |
|
|
quote |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
|
That concept looks great and they should build it.
While I consider design to be superior to styling, Americana is reflected in 'styling'. It's really OK to show some flair, the company will be the better for it. We don't need brand management that has every vehicle from sport convertible and entry level hatch, to sports car, pick-up and SUV all trying to forcibly incorporate the same cues. Let cars be what they want to be, and that is what a Camaro wants to be. ......................................... |
|
|
quote |
|
Member
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
quote |
|
ಠ_ರೃ
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
I'm not saying V8 muscle cars necessarily handle well either, I'm just pointing out the simple fact that a FWD car will suffer from understeer in hard cornering due to the front wheels being overworked. That's why true sports cars are RWD.
Unfortunately, the small, affordable sports cars of the 80s and 90s first went FWD and then disappeared in favor of FWD sport compacts. It's also why older small RWD cars are so popular these days - the Nissan Silvia/240SX, Toyota Corolla AE86, and Toyota MR2 are not especially powerful, but their RWD drivetrain gives them a lot of potential and they're still popular today despite their age, because there simply isn't anything on the market that's quite the same. If you want a RWD sports car now you have to go the extra mile and get something like a Mazda RX-8, Honda S2000, Nissan 350Z, or Ford Mustang. |
|
|
quote |
|
I shot the sherrif.
|
hey now, the RX8 isn't that expensive, esp. used.
![]() |
|
|
quote |
|
Member
|
I thought that there was a revival in small RWD roadsters? With the BMW Z4, Lotus Elise, Mazda MX-5, Honda S2000, Audi TT...
But anyway, Luca, you are right about the older Japanese RWD sportscars, those are brilliant if you just want to go "wild" and have a bit of drifting fun on the "closed and supervised parking lot"... and you can actually put more than your laptop in the boot of those cars too! ![]() |
|
|
quote |
| Posting Rules | Navigation |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |