With all the different variables and subtle influences on final sensor performance, and different strengths and weaknesses in various sensors, is not the "eye of the beholder" really the final judge? The science is fascinating, and developing quickly. I am glad that it is, and it is very worthy of interesting discussion. At the same time, I find it reassuring that there is no one right scientific answer to which is the single "best". When science meets art there should be plenty of room for many "bests". It is nice to think that different sensors might capture the same scene in different ways. That's the way it always was with film. It should be the same for digital.
When there's an eel in the lake that's as long as a snake that's a moray.
Last edited by Chinney : 2011-02-07 at 18:01.
|