Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave Ulysses
Did you not read any of the previous conversation?
|
What, the WSJ coincidence part? Because yes, I do think it's a coincidence. Conflicting rumors before an Apple event? Yeah, that's
never happened before...
Or the part where you suggested that we should take everything that the WSJ says seriously, because Apple has used them for controlled leaks in the past? Which means that you are seriously suggesting that either:
1) The WSJ should seek Apple's approval before posting anything Apple related, so people know that the WSJ is a reliable Apple rumor source, or,
2) Apple should have asked the WSJ to pull the iPhone 5 piece because it wasn't accurate, which would inevitably be interpreted as Apple asked the WSJ to pull the piece because it
was accurate?
The WSJ is going to print whatever they want to about Apple, and Apple isn't going to do anything about it. I'm honestly not sure why you are suggesting otherwise, seems like common sense to me.