Read another way it shows how much room there is to integrate the display and pass savings to the customer. One assumes that an M silicon chipset would replace the 9th gen iPad at the heart of the display and that one power supply and case will suffice for the device (rather than two) so there’s immediately some money saved in integration. But I don’t think that’s why the Studio Display costs. I think Apple’s priced it as a luxury item because they fully intend to present an iMac as a comparative bargain, and that would be a lot harder if the Studio Display were $999
|