Kick, not to be an asshole or something, but it sounds like you're undermining your own point- because if it's really the nth post that starts it all, just *exactly* which nth post is to be blamed (and thus a ban slapped on), thus defeating the whole idea of banning a idiot who can't keep his fire to himself because it's now diffused among several people...
Or am I not understanding something?
EDIT: To rephrase a bit, I would think it more workable to rap the first poster who inject an unnecessary ["Bush sucks!" | "Clinton swallows!"] statement in a unrelated thread, than waiting for nth post to bring it all to hell. Other posters should quickly figure that kind of junk isn't just accepted around here.
|