User Name
Password
AppleNova Forums » Third-Party Products »

XP Pro v. Home for BootCamp & Parallels


Register Members List Calendar Search FAQ Posting Guidelines
XP Pro v. Home for BootCamp & Parallels
Thread Tools
Mac Donald
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
 
2006-06-16, 18:33

Is there any reason to get Pro over Home for bootcamp and/or parallels? The only thing I would be using windows (mainly through parallels) for is running a couple of basic programs -- publisher, access, and a couple of others that are unavailable on the Mac. Also, I might use BootCamp to try out a few games. Is there any reason why I should pay extra for Pro????

Someone hacked my signature. I demand an investigation.
  quote
chucker
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: near Bremen, Germany
Send a message via ICQ to chucker Send a message via AIM to chucker Send a message via MSN to chucker Send a message via Yahoo to chucker Send a message via Skype™ to chucker 
2006-06-16, 18:37

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Donald
Is there any reason to get Pro over Home for bootcamp and/or parallels? The only thing I would be using windows (mainly through parallels) for is running a couple of basic programs -- publisher, access, and a couple of others that are unavailable on the Mac. Also, I might use BootCamp to try out a few games. Is there any reason why I should pay extra for Pro????
No, Home will probably be fine for your needs.
  quote
spikeh
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Send a message via AIM to spikeh Send a message via MSN to spikeh  
2006-06-16, 18:44

Home also contains most of the pro features in one way or another. You can access them by booting to XP in Safe mode.
  quote
rasmits
rams it
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
 
2006-06-16, 18:45

Quote:
Originally Posted by spikeh
Home also contains most of the pro features in one way or another. You can access them by booting to XP in Safe mode.
Are you serious? lame
  quote
ast3r3x
25 chars of wasted space.
 
Join Date: May 2004
Send a message via AIM to ast3r3x  
2006-06-16, 19:40

I thought Home couldn't access the second processor in a dual processor computer. Wouldn't that mean only one core?
  quote
chucker
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: near Bremen, Germany
Send a message via ICQ to chucker Send a message via AIM to chucker Send a message via MSN to chucker Send a message via Yahoo to chucker Send a message via Skype™ to chucker 
2006-06-16, 19:45

Quote:
Originally Posted by ast3r3x
I thought Home couldn't access the second processor in a dual processor computer. Wouldn't that mean only one core?
From Wikipedia:
Quote:
Symmetric multiprocessing, allowing the PC to divide work between multiple processors (CPUs)
(Windows XP Home Edition does, however, support the Hyper-threading functionality present on some Intel microprocessors. Although it has been reported to work on some dual-core microprocessors available from both AMD and Intel, Microsoft has recommended upgrading to Professional Edition for improved stability and compatibility.)
  quote
Schnauzer
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
 
2006-06-16, 19:47

i have pro for my intel imac and it runs fine
  quote
chucker
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: near Bremen, Germany
Send a message via ICQ to chucker Send a message via AIM to chucker Send a message via MSN to chucker Send a message via Yahoo to chucker Send a message via Skype™ to chucker 
2006-06-16, 19:52

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schnauzer
i have pro for my intel imac and it runs fine
Nobody is contesting that.
  quote
Schnauzer
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
 
2006-06-16, 19:56

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucker
Nobody is contesting that.

haha opps
my bad- brain lagg
  quote
spikeh
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Send a message via AIM to spikeh Send a message via MSN to spikeh  
2006-06-17, 04:49

Quote:
Originally Posted by rasmits
Are you serious? lame
Yup. If you run XP Home in Safe Mode you get all of the encryption services that you get in Pro and stuff like that. I've never been able to decide whether it was a fuckup by Microsoft or an intentional semi-easter egg
  quote
k squared
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Verde Amarela
 
2006-06-17, 07:28

Quote:
Originally Posted by ast3r3x
I thought Home couldn't access the second processor in a dual processor computer. Wouldn't that mean only one core?
Just to add to Chucker's reply: MacBooks only have a single processor -- with two cores. The Quad G5s have two processors with two cores per processor.
  quote
PB PM
Sneaky Punk
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Send a message via Skype™ to PB PM 
2006-06-17, 13:04

It doesn't matter, it still has two CPUs, and the OS still sees it as such. Dual cores doesn't change the fact that there are two CPUs.
  quote
Posting Rules Navigation
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Post Reply

Forum Jump
Thread Tools
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Final Cut Pro Academic Upgrading Timjay15 Genius Bar 3 2006-05-01 17:35
Athletes that you think might take steroids Messiahtosh AppleOutsider 42 2006-03-23 16:25
Imac G5 and Pro Mac doddler Speculation and Rumors 20 2006-02-02 16:31
iTunes 6.0.1 and Apple Pro App support 3.1 released Quagmire Apple Products 0 2005-10-20 17:30
QuickTime Pro for encoding H.264? Dorian Gray Purchasing Advice 3 2005-05-25 10:19


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2024, AppleNova