Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
|
Anyone know how the 160GB 7200 RPM and the 250GB 4200 RPM hard drives for the 17" macbook pro compare in performance? I would really love the extra space of the 250GB drive, but I am worried that it would not fast enough for FCP, Aperture and Logic.
(edit: MB to GB -- my mind is jello today.) Not like this. Not like this... Last edited by Res : 2007-07-04 at 14:44. |
quote |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
In my experience. A 4200RPM drive is suicide.
Also, I assume you mean GB. 250MB wouldn't be enough to hold OS 9 comfortably let alone OS X. |
quote |
Member
|
Don't go 4200. I just had one in my previous MBP and it was terrible for the applications you mentioned.
|
quote |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
|
Thanks, I will stick to the faster 160GB drive.
|
quote |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dubuque, IA
|
It's sad that Apple choose the cheaper (for them) 4200RPM drives over the faster (and thinner) 5400 rpm drives that Fujitsu also makes.
|
quote |
Posting Rules | Navigation |
|
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ultra-Thin MacBook Pro 12" | World Leader Pretend | Speculation and Rumors | 61 | 2007-01-09 02:43 |
imac versus macbook (pro) | elvismac | Purchasing Advice | 6 | 2006-06-28 18:50 |
Question about 17 inch macbook pro expose on battery!! | krnholeboy32 | General Discussion | 8 | 2006-06-21 17:19 |
Travel bag/case will for the MacBook Pro? | AlexN | Apple Products | 19 | 2006-02-28 00:20 |
MacBook Pro means MacBook? What about the iBook... | nato64 | Speculation and Rumors | 26 | 2006-01-13 14:07 |