User Name
Password
AppleNova Forums » Creative Endeavors »

The Black and White Photos Thread


Register Members List Calendar Search FAQ Posting Guidelines
The Black and White Photos Thread
Page 2 of 12 Previous 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next Last Thread Tools
World Leader Pretend
Ruling teh World
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
 
2006-11-01, 19:46

Mine:



  quote
Windswept
On Pacific time
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moderator's Pub
 
2006-11-01, 21:52

All shots from google. Sunrain oughta like this first one.


















  quote
Windswept
On Pacific time
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moderator's Pub
 
2006-11-01, 22:07

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSpotter View Post
A road a few hundred meters from our home:



Oh, GSpotter, the baboon is amazing and l love your dog. But *this* shot is just magnificent. How lucky you are to live near such dreamlike scenery.
  quote
Windswept
On Pacific time
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moderator's Pub
 
2006-11-01, 22:40

Quote:
Originally Posted by åsen View Post
It's just a random English tree, nothing extra special.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Windswept View Post
Ah, but look at it. It's perfectly upright and beautifully shaped.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryson View Post
Actually, I can think of over a hundred locations within a 5 miles of here that look that way. It's nothing special for us.
But asen and Bryson, some of us live in less favorable climes, where getting a tree to grow *at all* requires virtual divine intervention; and even then, it will never be as lush and perfect as asen's common, ordinary, everyday English tree standing anonymously and unappreciated in an unnamed field.

Harsh climes:





Wow. Just look at that rock wall in the upper right. It's just spectacular.

Photo by David Muench, whose nature work I love.
  quote
Kickaha
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
 
2006-11-01, 22:42

Y'know, I gave it <24 hrs before B/W nudes popped up, and leave it to Windswept to oblige, just under the wire. Heh.

No, I have nothing useful to add.
  quote
Windswept
On Pacific time
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moderator's Pub
 
2006-11-01, 22:49

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kickaha View Post
Y'know, I gave it <24 hrs before B/W nudes popped up, and leave it to Windswept to oblige, just under the wire. Heh.

No, I have nothing useful to add.
Aw, you don't really consider this a nude, do you?





But how about this? Interesting, huh?




Last edited by Windswept : 2006-11-01 at 22:56.
  quote
Phoenix
formerly "trav"
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Behind you
 
2006-11-01, 23:01

Is it just me or does it seem like B+W is being overused way to much these days? I'm not saying this thread isn't great or anything (i've really enjoyed it), i've just noticed lately that there are so many more B+W photo's out there. And most of the time they are just B+W for no reason, and it doesn't suit what they are trying to say.

I guess it's because photoshop is so easy to get hold of or something, but sometimes i look at photos and cringe because i'd much rather see them in colour.
  quote
GSpotter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: A small town near Wolfsburg, Germany
 
2006-11-02, 00:39

Quote:
Originally Posted by Windswept View Post
Oh, GSpotter, the baboon is amazing and l love your dog. But *this* shot is just magnificent. How lucky you are to live near such dreamlike scenery.
You weren't there when I shot this picture: It was snowing like crazy and nobody went outside if he hadn't to. I took an umbrella, my photobag and my tripod and headed for the nearby woods. Even though it was cold, after finishing the session, I was sweating (carrying several kilograms of photographic equipment and crouching next to a tripod while holding an umbrella to protect the camera takes its toll - talk about dedication )

As a bonus, here are two more pictures from that session:

Basically from the same spot than the first picture, only this time I used my super wide angle.


I few hundred meters further down the road (in the opposite direction than the above picture)

My photos @ flickr
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. -- Benjamin Franklin
  quote
GSpotter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: A small town near Wolfsburg, Germany
 
2006-11-02, 00:54

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
... i've just noticed lately that there are so many more B+W photo's out there. And most of the time they are just B+W for no reason, ...
I think, as b&w is different than our own vision, it "pops out" more, so esp. in advertisement is used to draw attention.

I normally use b&w only
- when I have a subject with high contrasts which I want to emphasise,
- when the subject is rather monochromatic anyway (as in my snow shots)
- when it fits the subject (e.g. the baskerville dog, or the following pictures)

Vault at the Maulbronn Monastery:


Remainings of castle Hohennagold:

My photos @ flickr
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. -- Benjamin Franklin
  quote
turtle
Lord of the Rant.
Formerly turtle2472
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Upstate South Carolina
 
2006-11-02, 01:17

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene View Post
Yeah, I was about to say rather than discarding chroma info, in those two pics it looks like a color-->grayscale conversion. Not quite the same. And that's the difference I mentioned above...Oftentimes when people want a quick, more accurate B&W conversion of the color photo, they merely discard two out of three of the primary colors RGB.
These were shot in B/W on highest JPEG. I just didn't adjust my levels on these copies since they were from my original images shot. I have a few images that were conversions, those were so I could pull out color in only a few areas of the image and leave the rest B/W.

Louis L'Amour, “To make democracy work, we must be a nation of participants, not simply observers. One who does not vote has no right to complain.”
Visit our archived Minecraft world! | Maybe someday I'll proof read, until then deal with it.
  quote
Powerdoc
Cat's Dreamlands
 
Join Date: May 2004
 
2006-11-02, 01:32

Quote:
Originally Posted by Windswept View Post
Much nicer.

(parking meter)
No surprise here : I second that
  quote
åsen
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
 
2006-11-02, 05:20

If anyone here uses Bibble for RAW processing, get the Andy plug-in for simulating the effects of numerous B&W film and paper brands.
  quote
joveblue
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne
 
2006-11-02, 08:25

Quote:
Originally Posted by Windswept View Post
But asen and Bryson, some of us live in less favorable climes, where getting a tree to grow *at all* requires virtual divine intervention; and even then, it will never be as lush and perfect as asen's common, ordinary, everyday English tree standing anonymously and unappreciated in an unnamed field.
You live in a desert? Why?
  quote
Eugene
careful with axes
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hillsborough, CA
 
2006-11-02, 10:08

Quote:
Originally Posted by turtle2472 View Post
These were shot in B/W on highest JPEG. I just didn't adjust my levels on these copies since they were from my original images shot. I have a few images that were conversions, those were so I could pull out color in only a few areas of the image and leave the rest B/W.
And that's precisely what I mean. Any in-camera B&W setting is basically applying a grayscale filter to color images. The CCD has red, green and blue photodetectors. It *wants* to shoot color. In fact, modern digicams are bad in the sense that there's only one type of photodetector at each pixel location. Color is therefore interpolated from data collected by adjacent photosites. And to digicams, not all colors are created equal. HALF the photodetectors on your camera's CCD are green, leaving the other half split evenly among red and blue.

Here are examples of how different photos can look when you separate the colors from each other...I hope kgarchar doesn't mind that I borrowed one of his photos...No other adjustments made.

red:


green:


blue:


red/blue:


I chose a close-up of a face because of the fine detail you can extract or discard just by doing this. Which version is the correct version? That's arbitrary.

Pertaining to this photo only:
Red-only results in the most pleasing skin tone and good contrast. Not surprisingly, green is closest to grayscale because of the CCD's bias toward that color. Blue-only really brings out dimension and, for lack of a better word, topographical detail.. Red+Blue is a compromise between tone and texture, while the discarded green leaves the background foliage mostly dark and out of the way.

Last edited by Eugene : 2006-11-02 at 11:09.
  quote
Windswept
On Pacific time
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moderator's Pub
 
2006-11-02, 10:32

Quote:
Originally Posted by joveblue View Post
You live in a desert? Why?
Well, joveblue, virtually one-third of the US can be categorized as 'moisture-challenged'.

The entire western US is mostly pretty darned dry, which explains the horrific wildfires many states suffer from every summer.

I remember once driving across eastern Oregon in June, and it was so hot that the trains had to stop service because the rails were melting.

Well, as it happens, I have five trees in my yard, including one magnificent ash tree, and an equally spectacular orange tree that produces the most succulently sweet oranges every spring.

But the difference is that *I* have to supply them with water, whereas asen's tree grows out there on its own, fending for itself, drinking of the bounteous moisture provided by English skies.
  quote
sunrain
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Portlandia
 
2006-11-02, 11:21

Quote:
Originally Posted by Windswept View Post
All shots from google. Sunrain oughta like this first one.

I do like, but it's up to you to figure out why.

Sorry I caught your post so late.
  quote
turtle
Lord of the Rant.
Formerly turtle2472
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Upstate South Carolina
 
2006-11-02, 13:35

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene View Post
And that's precisely what I mean. Any in-camera B&W setting is basically applying a grayscale filter to color images. The CCD has red, green and blue photodetectors. It *wants* to shoot color. In fact, modern digicams are bad in the sense that there's only one type of photodetector at each pixel location. Color is therefore interpolated from data collected by adjacent photosites. And to digicams, not all colors are created equal. HALF the photodetectors on your camera's CCD are green, leaving the other half split evenly among red and blue.

Here are examples of how different photos can look when you separate the colors from each other...I hope kgarchar doesn't mind that I borrowed one of his photos...No other adjustments made.

red:


green:


blue:


red/blue:


I chose a close-up of a face because of the fine detail you can extract or discard just by doing this. Which version is the correct version? That's arbitrary.

Pertaining to this photo only:
Red-only results in the most pleasing skin tone and good contrast. Not surprisingly, green is closest to grayscale because of the CCD's bias toward that color. Blue-only really brings out dimension and, for lack of a better word, topographical detail.. Red+Blue is a compromise between tone and texture, while the discarded green leaves the background foliage mostly dark and out of the way.
Thank you for explaining this. I really didn't know that. I assumed it was taking shots different than that. I guess it would be better then for me to just shoot in color and convert to B&W myself through Aperture or PS then? Also, I use a Canon which uses CMOS instead of CCD, is there a big difference in the handling of color/B&W there?

Would adjusting the Hue/Saturation to B&W be the same as removing just green, or blue and green? I'm gonna have to play some now....

Louis L'Amour, “To make democracy work, we must be a nation of participants, not simply observers. One who does not vote has no right to complain.”
Visit our archived Minecraft world! | Maybe someday I'll proof read, until then deal with it.
  quote
Windswept
On Pacific time
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moderator's Pub
 
2006-11-02, 14:35

Quote:
Originally Posted by World Leader Pretend View Post
Mine:


I really like this shot, World Leader Pretend.

Such a creative angle.
  quote
chucker
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: near Bremen, Germany
Send a message via ICQ to chucker Send a message via AIM to chucker Send a message via MSN to chucker Send a message via Yahoo to chucker Send a message via Skype™ to chucker 
2006-11-02, 14:50

Quote:
Originally Posted by turtle2472 View Post
Thank you for explaining this. I really didn't know that. I assumed it was taking shots different than that. I guess it would be better then for me to just shoot in color and convert to B&W myself through Aperture or PS then? Also, I use a Canon which uses CMOS instead of CCD, is there a big difference in the handling of color/B&W there?

Would adjusting the Hue/Saturation to B&W be the same as removing just green, or blue and green? I'm gonna have to play some now....
Yeah, forget about using your camera's B&W filter, just shoot in color. Aperture's monochrome mixer is a much more powerful tool than merely setting saturation to zero; you should look at it.
  quote
Windswept
On Pacific time
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moderator's Pub
 
2006-11-02, 15:17

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunrain View Post
I do like, but it's up to you to figure out why.
I'm really bad at riddles, sunrain.

Why not just *tell* me.

Is it your wife in the photo?

Or could it be that you have a foot fetish?

(just kidding )

See. Wouldn't it just be easier to just *tell* me???
  quote
joveblue
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne
 
2006-11-02, 20:58

Quote:
Originally Posted by Windswept View Post
Well, joveblue, virtually one-third of the US can be categorized as 'moisture-challenged'.
About 70% (estimate) of Australia can be categoriesed as 'moisture-challenged', but we don't live there... Well OK, some people do, but I don't know why... Actually you could probably describe the entire country as 'moisture-challenged' at the moment, we're a good five to ten years into a drought - yay for global warming!

Quote:
I remember once driving across eastern Oregon in June, and it was so hot that the trains had to stop service because the rails were melting.
That's severe.

</thread derailment>

Had a cute black and white photo of my dog, but can't find it
  quote
Windswept
On Pacific time
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moderator's Pub
 
2006-11-02, 21:25

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSpotter View Post
You weren't there when I shot this picture: It was snowing like crazy and nobody went outside if he hadn't to. I took an umbrella, my photobag and my tripod and headed for the nearby woods. Even though it was cold, after finishing the session, I was sweating (carrying several kilograms of photographic equipment and crouching next to a tripod while holding an umbrella to protect the camera takes its toll - talk about dedication )
I *do* admire your dedication, GSpotter.

And you certainly have some fantastic shots to show for it.

I've never had blizzards to contend with, but when traveling I do stop the car and climb up or downhill to get a perfect shot of some lovely scene.

Sometimes the climbs are perilous, and they are always time-consuming; but I think it's well worth it when the perfect shot is at stake.
  quote
World Leader Pretend
Ruling teh World
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
 
2006-11-02, 22:32

Quote:
Originally Posted by Windswept View Post
I really like this shot, World Leader Pretend.

Such a creative angle.
Thanks! I though it was pretty cool too when I saw the angle and snapped a picture.
  quote
Eugene
careful with axes
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hillsborough, CA
 
2006-11-02, 23:06

Quote:
Originally Posted by turtle2472 View Post
Thank you for explaining this. I really didn't know that. I assumed it was taking shots different than that. I guess it would be better then for me to just shoot in color and convert to B&W myself through Aperture or PS then? Also, I use a Canon which uses CMOS instead of CCD, is there a big difference in the handling of color/B&W there?

Would adjusting the Hue/Saturation to B&W be the same as removing just green, or blue and green? I'm gonna have to play some now....
Nah, CMOS or CCD doesn't really matter...except for the Foveon X3, they all apply Bayer interpolation to capture images.

Hue/Saturation is one way to do it...here's how to do it with live feedback:

1. Create a Hue/Saturation adjustment layer, type: Color.
2. Create a Hue/Saturation adjustment layer above it, type: Normal. Slide Saturation to -100
3. Go back to the first adjustment layer and move the Hue slider around.

A more flexible way to do it is to hit up the channel mixer, flick the monochrome box and mess with the RGB values.
  quote
World Leader Pretend
Ruling teh World
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
 
2006-11-06, 20:05

Kinda in a dull mood. There's a river.

  quote
Moogs
Hates the Infotainment
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NSA Archives
 
2006-11-06, 20:25

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene View Post
Which version is the correct version?

The one where she's not wearing clothes.

(seriously though, a useful explanation you provided for the uninitiated).


WLP: Very cool architectural abstract, actually pretty similar to my style as well. I shall now use some B&W powers from the future to post something groovy here (good thread idea).

...into the light of a dark black night.
  quote
Moogs
Hates the Infotainment
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NSA Archives
 
2006-11-06, 20:43

Mayberry anyone?

http://forums.applenova.com/attachme...1&d=1162863769
Attached Images
File Type: jpg moogberry.jpg (107.3 KB, 16 views)
  quote
Powerdoc
Cat's Dreamlands
 
Join Date: May 2004
 
2006-11-07, 07:25

Eugene. If my memory is correct, you were much interested by the foveon technology.
Are you going to invest in a new sigma camera, like the one who are going to be shipped ?
  quote
stevegong
www.stevegongphoto.com
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: London
Send a message via AIM to stevegong Send a message via Skype™ to stevegong 
2006-11-07, 10:47

Here's one that I shot


I typically find Black and White to be less exciting than colour because it's leaving out so much. I also think that a lot of amateur photographers like black and white because it takes an otherwise mundane photograph and makes it "artistic" just because the medium is so much associated with fine art, and more of a novelty these days.

Colour if done well can make the photos look so much more exciting.
  quote
Dorian Gray
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Paris, France
 
2006-11-07, 13:41

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevegong
Colour if done well can make the photos look so much more exciting.
However, a common problem with snapshots is too much information: photos full of clutter that detracts from the subject matter. The solution is often to move closer (not "zoom in" which just flattens everything and makes for boring photos), but simply removing the colour also has a clutter-reducing effect which can make terrible snapshots marginally more attractive.

In other words, it takes more skill to shoot good colour than good black and white, although obviously the whole Ansel Adams approach to photography is extremely technical and scientific (to the detriment of overall interest, in my opinion). I have the Ansel Adams trilogy (Camera, Negative, Print) which devotes a lot of its 750 pages of very dense technical discussion to the Zone System. After studying it in some detail I came to the conclusion that few photographers need to know this stuff, although a good knowledge of exposure is essential to avoid the I-wonder-how-that-photo-will-"come-out" syndrome, or its modern day equivalent: shooting dozens of digital shots while chimping (even the pros do it!). Ansel Adams' Zone System can certainly produce ethereal tonality, but the type of people who are capable of fully understanding the Zone System rarely have a creative bone in their bodies. Ansel Adams himself was no exception.

Jeff Spirer is a wonderful black and white photographer (and colour photographer too). He has a large fan base on photo.net where he regularly posts street photos. Jeff has a knack for finding the graceful in the ugly, and the redeeming humanity of the brute. Here's one of his pictures, taken outside a McDonald's restaurant. I plan to buy a print of this (when I graduate and get a job! ). In this version the Golden Arches is quite subtle, which is how I would like it on my future print; however, I think he should dodge the logo a bit for the casual viewer who might not notice the logo during a brief glance.


… engrossed in such factional acts as dreaming different dreams.
  quote
Posting Rules Navigation
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Page 2 of 12 Previous 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next Last

Post Reply

Forum Jump
Thread Tools
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mac book White upgraded vs.Black Mac Book LightYourVision Purchasing Advice 13 2006-05-22 12:58
Why does iPod video sell better in white, while Nano sells better in black? Doxxic Apple Products 8 2005-12-17 11:45
iPod nano: black or white? Messiahtosh Apple Products 68 2005-09-25 10:12
Hate white text on black backgrounds for websites? BarracksSi Genius Bar 17 2005-01-17 22:09
A return to black in '05? Satchmo Speculation and Rumors 81 2004-12-19 23:56


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:47.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2024, AppleNova