Veteran Member
|
Ok.. So here's yet another wacky rumour from engadget..
http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/w...nch-in-august/ My $500 under my mattress is starting to tingle.. WIth the massive rise in Mac sales, and the impending Zune debacle from M$, has Apple finally decided that this is the new toy they need to get out there to steal M$'s thunder again, and consolidate on their 'mobile toys' market lead? If this is true I guess the sub-portable is out the window for now.. Just too many new things in August.. What do people think? 'Remember, measure life by the moments that take your breath away, not by how many breaths you take' Extreme Sports Cafe | ESC's blog | scratt's blog | @thescratt |
quote |
Formerly Roboman, still
awesome Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, OR
|
Yikes. Right after the US debut of LG's Chocolate phone, and right before the onslaught of Motorola's KRZR, RIZR, and RAZR MAXX? I don't think so.
Also, if the phone was launching in November, it would have to have recieved FCC approval by now (meaning it would have probably been published on the FCC website). Also, as Engadget commenters pointed out, if the device launched next month, photography would have probably been completed months ago. But then again, Apple does usually show pre-rendered shots of their products anyway. And their FCC filing could still be confidential. Still, I'm not holding my breath for an iPhone in August. and i guess i've known it all along / the truth is, you have to be soft to be strong |
quote |
Veteran Member
|
"One more thing... The Apple iPhone shipping in time for Christmas" ?
It could also simply be a rebuttal to M$'s Zune craptastic offering... Daring Fireball had a really cool commentary on this whole debacle.. http://daringfireball.net/2006/07/magic_8ball_zune Quote:
Quote:
https://www.comingzune.com/ Craptastic is not a good enough descriptive for that!! A pedophile, a young boy and a rabbit... To launch an iPod copy, that looks worse than most Chinese copies of said gadget! Bwuuhaaaahaaaaahaaaaaahaaaaa! oh.. and the logo! Class! Real Class! Perhaps someone should remind them that Vista still needs to be finished.. 'Remember, measure life by the moments that take your breath away, not by how many breaths you take' Extreme Sports Cafe | ESC's blog | scratt's blog | @thescratt Last edited by scratt : 2006-07-30 at 00:11. |
||
quote |
I was knighted
|
I'll believe it when I see it. These Apple phone rumors are crazy. If I was SJ, I wouldn't want to get in this industry. Yes, it is fast-growing, but cell phones always have problems it seems. Who knows.. maybe Apple can help fix that trend.
Again, I'll believe it when I see it. (And probably open my checkbook along with it ) Deal with it. |
quote |
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
|
|
quote |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
i'd like to see a Dell phone personally.
it would be exciting to see random phones exploding on your morning commute. |
quote |
BANNED
I am worthless beyond hope. Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
You sound like every PC dweeb 9 years ago talking about the PowerBook |
|
quote |
Formerly "djfusion"
|
Quote:
But to be on topic, I really can't see how Apple would entere into a market so different than what they're used to. In so far as iPods and Macs, Apple is selling (almost all of the time) directly to consumers. Whereas in the cellphone market, manufacturers (assuming that's the position Apple would take, rather than forming a MVNO) sell to the carriers. In the end, it's not so much the features that consumers want, it's what the carriers allow them access to. Unless, of course, Apple were to sell phones independent of a carrier, which would make their pricing significantly higher, and more equal to that of an iPod. The problem with that, however, is that most cellphone users in the U.S. are unwilling to pay more than 200 bucks for a phone (excepting business and "power" users, I suppose). Apple would have to convince them otherwise. The third option, as I see it, is for Apple to form a MVNO (Mobile Virtual Network Operator - something like Virgin Mobile, ESPN Mobile, Boost, Tracfone, etc.) Then they could perhaps pull a Verizon and use phones from various manufacturers, but all with Apple's own custom interface. Hopefully it'd look better than the standard, hideous Verizon one. But that said, I really don't think there's much accuracy to this rumor. If Apple were to begin selling a phone next week on a major carrier (most likely Cingular?) we'd have heard about it long ago, as the price sheets for various phone models come out far in advance (see EngadgetMobile). If they were launching a MVNO, we would have heard rumblings far back, I think. Something as big as that would have somehow leaked (right?). The second option is the one that is, in my mind, the least unlikely. If they were developing it completely internally, they could have kept a tight lid on it. The FCC filings could be confidential (as Roboman pointed out), and there would be no carrier price sheets to be leaked. |
|
quote |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Quote:
that makes things worse for dell then, their laptops are exploding now. |
|
quote |
Lovable Bastard
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston-ish
|
When the iPod came out, it was very expensive compared to the rest of the market. You could spend $250 with Creative and get a 6GB Nomad Jukebox. It was a pain in the ass to use, huge, heavy, and ran on USB 1.1, so it took several hours to transfer a single album, but it was a 6 GB MP3 player, none the less. I believe it was also the dominant HD-based MP3 player. (It might've been the only one...)
The point is, Apple isn't afraid to bust into a market with a premium-priced item because they know the Apple faithful will jump on that bandwagon and get the new products name out. Then, a year later, when they announce a price drop along with Windows compatibility, it draws that many more consumers in. Apple has a wonderful marketing tool that it doesn't pay a dime for: us. If we see an iPhone, it will probably be Cingular. Cingular has the largest network, which is getting more filled in every day. (Except for the 2 square miles surrounding my house ) That, and Apple has already launched iTunes on Cingular phones. As for it being this month? Could happen, but not likely. Apple will have developed it completely internally, and only a handful of the top Cingular guys know anything about it. The FCC filing could be confidential. It COULD happen. Finally, there isn't really a reason Apple couldn't sell the phone themselves. If I were Apple, I wouldn't let the Cingular stores get their hands on the iPhone. It would mean that Apple stores would have to have a little Cingular information in them, and it would also mean the Apple store employees would have to be versed in the plans that Cingular offers. But it beats the alternative of letting the Cingular stores and employees handle it. But honestly? I wouldn't bet on this any time soon. We have been waiting for the iPhone for a very, very long time. Practically since the iPod was proven to be more than just a niche media player. Logic, logic, logic. Logic is the beginning of wisdom, Valeris, not the end. Last edited by Kraetos : 2006-07-30 at 14:43. |
quote |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
But I agree, it's highly unlikely that Apple would sell to other carriers - especially since it would probably feel that they're 'compromizing' the iPhone UI with whatever carrier-specific changes they make. |
|
quote |
Rocket Surgeon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Canadark
|
Amp'd is an MVNO, which he already mentioned.
Apple as a MVNO? I can't see that, to be honest. An interesting alternative would be for them to simply sell the handsets "unlocked" so they'd work on whatever network (assuming this vapourware handset has the correct protocols). Expensive, maybe, but more expensive than a decent handset and an iPod? Maybe not. |
quote |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
quote |
Member
|
Here's my guess for the iPhone / iPod chat.
Sleek. Very sleek. Similar in shape and appearance to a nano, though with 10 # buttons. Very simple, great UI. Capacities of a $149 iPod nano: 1GB of storage. Works only with Cingular. Pricey. $249, *with* a 2-year contract. Last edited by Hobbes : 2006-07-30 at 21:58. |
quote |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
|
|
quote |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
quote |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London, UK
|
Quote:
I think the iPod will be carrier-free, but slightly more expensive because of it. In the UK, I think a price of £200-250 is realistic. "Tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms further" - The Great Gatsby |
|
quote |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Warm Glow of Steve's RDF
|
Actually, with Sony Ericsson and one of their unlocked phones you can go to the website and click off carrier and model an they will text you the auto config file.
Kinka sweet. |
quote |
Veteran Member
|
That is cool.. Something Palm should do, but they suck a$$ at any kind of decent support..
|
quote |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London, England
|
Apple could sell phones without worrying a jot about mobile carriers if they make it a wifi iChat phone. You'd also remove the need for all those pesky number buttons. Think of it this way, it's an iPod not a mobile phone, BUT you can make calls to people in your iChat buddy list when in range of a wifi hotspot. Nintendo offer free wireless for the DS Lite all over the place, perhaps Apple could make the same deal. Nintendo have also quite successfully managed the power issues of wifi in a mobile device.
Of course if the iPod has wifi all sort of things are possible. Wireless synching, direct music downloads, iPods on the local network appearing in Front Row. Bonjour pong anyone? |
quote |
Space Pirate
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta
|
That's cool news TednDi!!
I'm loathe to lock myself into a 2 year contract but am worried about not getting 'proper' service from the carrier if I don't buy from them. Interestingly, it seems that a lot of the storefront 'Cingular' stores are really only licensed dealers... not quite the 'company store' that I always assumed them to be. Have to check out NewEgg's offerings now, though navigating the endless setup menus confuse me when looking at network settings. I'd be afraid I'd never get it set up right... but if SE has downloads that do it all FOR you then I am very, very interested... I just wish that I could configure my current T-616 to act as a Bluetooth modem for my Powerbook... it's beyond me how to do that. |
quote |
Formerly "djfusion"
|
Quote:
|
|
quote |
Member
|
Quote:
buttons - excuse me, I mean 12. The standard key pad. Plus of course the click-wheel that will handle dial and power functions. only a single provider - because that's how Apple works. Unlocked phones are the realm of geeks, not everyday consumers. |
|
quote |
BANNED
I am worthless beyond hope. Join Date: May 2006
|
I find it hard to believe Apple would go to the enormous risk of entering the cell phone arena and then only allow one provider to sell the phones. I don't care how loyal/rabid Apple enthusiasts are; cellular service is governed by 1 and 2-year contracts, and not many people are going to breach their existing cellular contracts so they can immediately switch to a different provider and have an Apple phone.
iPods were one thing: A new product people could buy without terminating any existing contracts/relationships. But cell phones are a whole different product, and to possibly prevent thousands upon thousands of Apple enthusiasts from using one (by limiting them to one carrier) seems like a bad business model. If Verizon adds an Apple phone, I'll probably buy one on Day 1. But I'm not going to cancel a 12-year relationship with Verizon if Apple decides only Cingular is worthy of an Apple phone. Last edited by apple007 : 2006-07-31 at 10:51. |
quote |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Warm Glow of Steve's RDF
|
Just remember to use GSM with a sim card.
The unlocked thing will NOT work in CDMA networks. Also, if you travel abroad often enough, you can buy pre paid sim cards and thus get a local european number. I have one from Virgin in the UK and the money in the account never gets reduced if you don't use it. Unlike the US carriers and their pre-paid sim cards with their recurring monthly charges. You just pop the sim card out and swap in the new sim card keeping your address book, etc with you on your phone. Also, try and get a quad band phone if you use Cingular. It would appear that Cingular uses the 850 and 900 bands. So if you only have the tri band phone, you don't get the 850 coverage. Sorry for derailing the thread. So, I want an apple iPhone and apple/.mac as the service. Unlocked of course! Wifi a total plus. with web capabilities and GPS! Sweet!! |
quote |
Space Pirate
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta
|
The one true advantage to that is grabbing the iTunes mobile market and not letting it get penny-penched by the outlets like Cingular, who wouldn't BEGIN to dream of handing that market over to Apple. See, they want to SOAK consumers for as much as they can, it's part of the standard business cycle: release features incrementally, squeezing as much as you can with each new release. The restlessness of the modern consumer and the rapidity of asian production is robbing companies like Cingular and the rest of this standard incremental feature release cycle by accelerating the whole deal.
If Apple stepped in with a phone that hooked toward Apple's services there'd be little incentive for Cingular to sell them.... |
quote |
Member
|
Quote:
So either Apple strikes an exclusive deal with one provider willing to take a cut instead being greedy, like Cingular (with whom they've already established a relationship) or they do a MVNO. I'm betting on the first. |
|
quote |
BANNED
I am worthless beyond hope. Join Date: May 2006
|
But if that is all true, wouldn't the latter be more likely to be the direction taken by Apple? Any increased profits possibly seen by Apple as a result of an exclusive deal with one carrier would almost assuredly be more than offset by losses caused by that exclusivity due to millions of potential users locked into existing cellular contracts.
|
quote |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Warm Glow of Steve's RDF
|
Apple can negotiate with Cingular to become a MVNO. They just buy huge chunks of time from Cingular and Huge data blocks.
In exchange Apple can license to them the ITMS for their own downloads. |
quote |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida
|
I don't know. IF Apple puts out a phone, I'm going to find it hard to believe they tie themselves to a carrier because, as some have said, people won't break a contract with one company just to get a phone from another. I believe I'm like most people in that I've been with my current cell provider for many years and don't really care what phones they sell, I'm sticking with them because of their service and quality. If they have cool phones its just a bonus. The iTunes on the Cingular phones is one thing but I don't think they'll make any potential phone be tied to a Cingular network.
|
quote |
Posting Rules | Navigation |
|
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Absurd Separation of Powers at Apple Computer Inc. | tyguy01234 | Apple Products | 44 | 2005-10-11 11:57 |
OSX Subscription? | chaos123x | Speculation and Rumors | 4 | 2005-06-09 09:56 |
Help... What can I do?? | macaddict23 | General Discussion | 10 | 2005-03-26 02:23 |