Mr. Vieira
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
|
Yeah, it isn’t just the guzzlers suffering. I drive a smallish Toyota with respectable MPG and I’m feeling this too. Right at $4/gallon here in southeastern Tennessee. Maybe as high as I’ve ever seen it. I remember just three Christmases ago, filling up my Saturn for $1.89/gallon at the little Stop ‘n’ Rob down the road. It’s $3.91 as of yesterday. It was $3.97 2-3 weeks ago so I guess I should be falling to my knees in gratitude…
I’ve never owned/driven anything other than small, gas-efficient Hondas., Saturns and, currently, Toyota. Little two-door sedans/coupes. I wouldn’t own a big gas-guzzling vehicle if I won it in a contest. “Can I have a nice toaster oven instead? Maybe one of those cool modern vacuum cleaners? I really don’t need a tank, thanks…”. |
quote |
Member
Join Date: May 2004
|
In California, most stations (excluding places like COSTCO) sell for just under $6 per gallon.
Just after the war started when gas prices were peaking, my gas mileage went down almost 20% for a couple of tankfuls (highway driving from Northern to Southern California and back). I suspect some gas suppliers used more ethanol in the mix. My gas mileage has gradually been returning to normal. An unrelated note regarding U.S. gas prices versus the world: When I was stationed in Italy (late 1990s), each service member was allotted a ration of gas coupons that could be purchased at a discount to the local gas prices. I think it was also like that in Germany also. |
quote |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Promise Land of Trustafarians
|
Quote:
|
|
quote |
Which way is up?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boyzeee
|
Price depends on a lot of things.
- Proximity to the pump - Proximity to the depot - Proximity to the refinery - Proximity to the oil fields Location, location, location And then there's taxation, which in California is very high, while in Colorado it's very low (as it is here in Idaho, but proximity to the refinery is farther than Colorado). So many factors determine the price of gas, and some of those factors are artificial (such as supply constraints), while others are variable (demand, which is almost always high). It's a game, and we're all pawns. I don't fully understand all of the logistics involved, but one thing I do know: The price of gas is being artificially raised independent of demand. It's far more profitable to pump less oil and charge more for it than to pump more and charge less. The people who play these games don't care about the economic consequences to the surfs. They care only about the short-term profits they can rake in while the world trembles in the artificial fear of Russia cutting off supply, which hasn't (and isn't likely) going to happen. - AppleNova is the best Mac-users forum on the internet. We are smart, educated, capable, and helpful. We are also loaded with smart-alecks! :) - Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God. (Mat 5:9) |
quote |
Member
Join Date: May 2004
|
While California is home to many refineries, it also has its own version of the EPA, which insists on using gas additives. Sometimes the solutions end up being worse than the problem, and MTBE (methyl text-butyl ether), which was used for decades, is now banned. MBTE affects water quality (taste and odor), has various health effects depending on concentration, and tended to degrade rubber hoses in engines, among other things. Residents near state borders often cross the lines to get less expensive gasoline.
|
quote |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
People have been told over and over that the climate 'emergency' requires exceptional attention, and in short order we expect to be facing any number of related disasters, including but not limited to increasing fires, floods, hurricanes, and other devastating consequences. Humanity is generally self-protecting. So when you send political messaging like that out, it shouldn't be a surprise when people buy vehicles they think will be capable of protecting their families in disastrous conditions. No-one expecting to be engulfed in an apocalypse is going out and buying a Hyundai Accent. It's no surprise that everyone thinks their neighbours should sacrifice for the planet, whilst doing the exact opposite for themselves and their families. Unintended consequences indeed. |
|
quote |
Sneaky Punk
|
A modern pickup truck can hardly survive use as a work truck for 5-6 years, let alone an apocalypse.
|
quote |
Space Pirate
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta
|
Everybody knows that Rental Cars are the best vehicles for extreme driving.
.. |
quote |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK's most densely packed city. It's not London...
|
|
quote |
‽
|
Oil is "falsely scarce"?
|
quote |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK's most densely packed city. It's not London...
|
|
quote |
‽
|
|
quote |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK's most densely packed city. It's not London...
|
I wasn’t referring to the war being the crisis, but the oil prices, which is the proximal subject being discussed.
|
quote |
Lord of the Rant.
Formerly turtle2472 Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Upstate South Carolina
|
So latest news in Russian troops did horrible and despicable acts in the places they occupied prior to pulling out of those regions. Bucha being the place that seems to be the worse based on reports I've seen.
I'm putting this in spoiler tags for those who don't want to read more specifics: Spoiler (click to toggle):
I know war is hell, but the worse part of all of this is no single Russian will be held accountable for this. If it were the US we would have an Inspector General (or their team) up the service member's business until they had enough evidence to punish them. They would dress down entire platoons and such to find exactly who did what. Russia, I'm guessing Putin would buy those soldiers a beer. Louis L'Amour, “To make democracy work, we must be a nation of participants, not simply observers. One who does not vote has no right to complain.” Visit our archived Minecraft world! | Maybe someday I'll proof read, until then deal with it. |
||
quote |
Mr. Vieira
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
|
Every slaughtered civilian, every raped woman, every fatherless child, every destroyed home, every atrocity, every "ohmigosh, this is just like 1938...", etc., the world allowed to happen. All because one beady-eyed hump decided he needed to act the role. And we let him.
We should be ashamed. We won't be, because that might require action or tough decisions. That's not really a hallmark of 2022 life. Tweeting your Outrage™ and saying hollow, meaningless stuff like "I stand with Ukraine" (for the likes and warm-and-fuzzies), that's a bit more doable, isn't it? No, I don't know the answer...I'm not a military strategist or politician. But sitting around with our collective thumb buried way up there as innocent people, through no fault/doing of their own, get killed for nearly two months...that sure as fuck isn't any sort of proper approach/solution either. Unbelievable. "Never again"...just hollow, empty words people knee-jerkingly like to say, with absolutely nothing behind it. Evil must be confronted, dealt with and stopped. When it isn't, really horrible things tend to happen. How in God's name do we not know this by now? How many more examples are needed? I guess it's time I grew up and learn to see all the wonderful shades of grey (thousands, apparently) there are in the world. |
quote |
Sneaky Punk
|
It’s called the harsh reality of the modern world, as a result of MAD. This is a tragedy of our collective making, just like every war in history. Nobody wants to start the kind of war that would come from the west getting directly involved, because that ends far, far worse than what is happening in the Ukraine.
Never again is a wonderful idea idea in theory, but as long as there are people who have different ideas of how the world should be governed, financed, and we cling to our useless nationalist ideas, there will be war. That’s the cold hard facts. |
quote |
‽
|
|
quote |
Mr. Vieira
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
|
Then could we just have Putin and an opponent of NATO's choosing get in the ring for a PPV special, and settle this on Saturday night? Or is that just asking too much?
|
quote |
Sneaky Punk
|
If only the kings never used the chess pieces in their games. So what if the leaders have a boxing match? Do you want something as pathetic as that determining the fate of millions of people? How is that better? Sure nobody dies in a war, but how many people die after for not wanting to live by the results, or because they think differently? That solves nothing, at least in this war the Ukrainians can fight for what they want, rather than some arbitrary David vs Goliath match.
|
quote |
Mr. Vieira
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
|
Pretty sure I was joking (out of exasperation; but I still bet most would love to see someone beat his ass half to death, just on general principle).
I don't think Putin represents some huge swath of thought. I just don't. I don't think most people think like that, or want the grief he's bringing in their name. Who goes and invades places? Nobody's still wearing helmets with horns and swinging broadswords. He looks like an maniacal idiot, all he's done since February. Whatever "support" he may have is probably no deeper than a mud puddle. Eliminate him and see what happens. If he's replaced by someone even worse (really?), there are ways to deal with that too. But we know the current guy isn't worth a shit, and isn't acting right. So do we just put up with that? Doesn't seem right either. That's why I keep hoping Russians themselves put him on ice, so other nations can't be blamed or directly in the mix. If his own countrymen figure out how to deliver a resounding "fuck you", he kinda has to take it (assuming he's still drawing a breath; I would hope he wasn't). So I keep hoping for that headline. That beats the present situation, IMO. Civilians being slaughtered, raped, etc. is nothing to strive for/be okay with. A year from now, what other countries may join Ukraine on that awful list? Is that what he's going for? Is the world going to stand by and let that happen too? At what point is it enough, and "over the line"? I would've thought it was about seven weeks ago, but I obviously missed that call. I just hate that one man can do this to the world. I hate bullies and troublemakers, whether it's the schoolyard, workplace or somewhere I've never even been (and may have a bit of trouble finding on a map right away). It's all the same to me. Last edited by psmith2.0 : 2022-04-06 at 09:51. |
quote |
Which way is up?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boyzeee
|
Quote:
In the meantime, avoiding "The Catastrophe" is priority numeral uno. Is there any way short of sanctions to kick Putin's ass that does not also lead to a nuclear world war? I don't think so. If NATO decides to attack — even if nuclear weapons can be avoided — then that drives the entirety of Europe into yet another massively destructive war. While that's going on, China has no reason to leave Taiwan alone, and there goes the "Pacific Theater" as Japan and South Korea find themselves in China's crosshairs, as well as the Philippines. However, there appears to be one saving grace to the whole thing, and one that should be used if it can be agreed that nuclear weapons will not be used, and that is this: It appears that Russia's oligarchs have been skimming so much off the top that Russia's monster army has been left in disrepair, such that the might of the famed Bear is struggling to conquer a small nation right on it's borders. This gives me hope that Nato could kick Russia's arrogant ass! I'm not so sure that Russia would be a match for NATO, anymore, without the nuclear option. But, then we have to figure out how to keep China out of the melee! - AppleNova is the best Mac-users forum on the internet. We are smart, educated, capable, and helpful. We are also loaded with smart-alecks! :) - Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God. (Mat 5:9) |
|
quote |
Sneaky Punk
|
Russia’s biggest problem is boots on the ground. The Ukrainian’s have more, and they are highly motivated. The Russian troops are poorly motivated, simple as that. Putin is still has over 60% support, which went up rather than down, because Russians share his fear of the west overall. Putin won’t risk mass conscription, that would likely turn people again him, which is why they mostly conscripted people who lived near the boarder.
|
quote |
Which way is up?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boyzeee
|
Yeah, it's funny how powerful a tank is when you have infantry support, and just how vulnerable they are without it. Russia is learning the hard way just how badly they need those "boots on the ground", because they're losing unsupported tanks like mad.
Must be frustrating for the tank crews. - AppleNova is the best Mac-users forum on the internet. We are smart, educated, capable, and helpful. We are also loaded with smart-alecks! :) - Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God. (Mat 5:9) |
quote |
Sneaky Punk
|
Most of what Russia is losing is older equipment, T-55, T64, T72. I have not seen any dead T-90s, most of which are with experienced units in the eastern part of Ukraine. I’d hazard I guess that most of the lost and wayward units are newer inexperienced units wit old, albeit upgraded, hardware.
|
quote |
@kk@pennytucker.social
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
I've been checking this site which has been keeping track of the equipment lost on both sides.
Interesting to see the HMMV listed on the Ukrainian side. Didn't know that Ukraine had any of those. No more Twitter. It's Mastodon now. |
quote |
Sneaky Punk
|
Good info, thanks for the link.
|
quote |
@kk@pennytucker.social
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
There are also a few Twitter accounts that have been tracking this stuff, but the one that has been the most active has been Ukraine Weapons Tracker
|
quote |
Member
Join Date: May 2004
|
In case anyone is interested, the congressperson posted the results of her survey about what relief the federal government should provide for the increased gasoline prices:
"I sent a survey to constituents requesting feedback on how Congress should address increased gas prices. The survey was completed by 10,097 participants and the results are below: 3,435 voted to suspend the 18.4 cent per gallon federal gas tax 2,520 voted for ‘other’ 2,165 voted in favor of rebates to consumers to offset higher gas prices 1,977 voted for no action" "This week the Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing on soaring gas prices with the CEOs of six large oil companies as witnesses: bp America, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell USA, Devon Energy, and Pioneer Natural Resources. The average price in California is $5.84 per gallon. As we pay record prices at the pump, oil companies are earning record profits. In fact, the six companies at the hearing earned more than $76 billion in profits last year. The industry has made clear that their priority is to protect their shareholders, and the seven largest oil companies, including those who testified, announced $41 billion in stock buybacks this year. I asked the CEOs if Congress were to suspend the gas tax, would they guarantee that the savings would be passed on to consumers, or whether oil companies would pocket the savings. The CEOs gave no assurances that they would pass the savings on to their customers. " |
quote |
Posting Rules | Navigation |
Page 3 of 7 Previous 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meet the New Russia, Same as the Old Russia... | Moogs | AppleOutsider | 332 | 2008-08-27 23:39 |
Russia, China start war games | rasmits | AppleOutsider | 30 | 2007-08-18 10:30 |
Getting Hammered: Russia-Style! | Moogs | AppleOutsider | 4 | 2007-06-16 11:53 |