Sucker for shiny objects
|
Quote:
Like one article I read (I think it was an ars one) said that the music industry was crying because they only have one source of revenue (sale of online music) whereas Apple has two (sale of online music and the iPod). We can all tell that this is total BS because the music industry is having the most successful years it has ever had now. Unfortunately, its not enough and we will most likely get screwed when Apples music contract comes up in 2006. |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago
|
The thing is, Apple is in a position where they can say to the record companies, "this is how it's going to be. Take it or leave it." The record companies know that, and so does Apple. It's because Apple is in the top spot and no one is gaining ground on them. The record companies know that if they want to sell product online and make online sales a profitable venture for their company, they sell through the iTMS. They could go to Napster, but they won't make as much money, they could go to Rhapsody, but they won't make nearly as much money.
The iTMS is the leader in online music sales and will be for the foreseeable future. Apple didn't do it first, but like with many other things, they did it right. Record companies know that, and that's why Apple can put an offer on the table and be comfortable walking away without a deal. Make no mistake about it, the record companies need Apple, not the other way around. Apple has their revenue and they have the big names in music already signed to deals with the iTMS. Apple is in a sweet spot, they know it, and so does everyone else. Hopefully they won't get stagnant and blow it all. Come waste your time with me |
Sucker for shiny objects
|
Im hoping it doesnt turn out that way either because I really dont want a pricing system similar to what Japan has for their iTMS or a price increase. That would pretty much kill the iTMS for me personally.
Plus, I would like to see a similar system for video downloads in a year or so. Only time will tell I guess. |
Formerly Roboman, still
awesome Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, OR
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for what I would watch on an iPod video? Well, I'd like to note something that seems to be lost on everybody else: It's called the "iPod video," not the "iPod feature film." As in, it can play more than just two hour motion pictures. I'm a big movie buff, so I'd probably use it most to watch movies whenever and wherever I want, but you could also, you know, put TV shows on the thing. Apple could even sell them online - if not individually, then certainly in the DVD season packs. Heck, I'd be able to enjoy an episode of The Simpsons every time I was in the waiting room (which is a lot, now that I have braces...woo-hoo...). I mean, I'd download tons of funky videos from the internet and put them on there - I'm already imagining terrorizing a friend with that video of the cat swinging around on the cieling fan. Oh, and Video Podcasts are a possibility, too - many sites (GameSpot, Engadget) already have their own online "shows." Finally, it could act like a mobile TiVo for your digital content. Staying in a hotel? I'd rather bring a bunch of shows and movies with me on my iPod video then rent something. Video-out is a given, so you'd be able to plug it in and enjoy. My point is, an iPod video would be useful for more than "just" when you're on a plane and want to watch Hollywood's latest "masterpiece." |
||
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Seattle
|
So my friend broke the screen on his iPod and when he told me over LJ that he got a new one, I told him a video ipod may be out soon.
He dug around for a while and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/render2b.jpg">this</a>is what he found. It's obviously photoshopped but it is a possibility. I always thought they would keep the same design of all the other iPods. I use both Mac and PC and on the PC, you can minimize WMP to the taskbar and have a small window pop-up that shows what you're playing (video for instance). What pops up is smaller than an iPod screen but I can watch "A Clockwork Orange" fine. |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
hmm... i think that if its going to be a phone/music player it has to be a music player first and act as a cell phone second... iPod is way too branded as a mp3 player to all of a sudden have phone capabilities. its also too gimmicky for apple to come out with a phone that also plays music, its messy... thats why i hope indeed it is the motorolla phone and not an actual apple product.
Last edited by tannenhauser : 2005-09-01 at 14:39. |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago
|
This is the picture Greg was trying to post from above:
For the record...I hope that's not what it looks like. For future reference, html tags won't fly here, only vB stuff. It's kinda odd, but that's just the way things are. Come waste your time with me |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
Quote:
Of course, she has a n album coming out later this year..I doubt she wouldn't want it to be on itunes. |
|
Formerly Roboman, still
awesome Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, OR
|
Yeah, that's a hideous mockup.
I've always pictured the iPod video as looking quite similair to the Zen Vision...remove some of Vision's less necessary face buttons, replace that "control square" with an iPod shuffle-esque "control circle," move said circle towards the top of the unit (better ergonomics), and voila. (I think the Zen Vision has a 4:3 display...I think the iPod video would have 16:9.) I supposed a picture of the Vision would be helpful, but I don't know how to post a picture in vB. Sorry. |
A for effort.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
|
[IMG] http://image.url.here/without/spaces/between.tags [/IMG]
|
rams it
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
|
If it is a video iPod, I truly hope they don't call the video store the iTunes Video Store. That name is seriously heinous. iTunes for music. iFlicks for movies. (Or what ever they want to call it). It's a little contradictive to say "iTunes Video Store".
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Amsterdam
|
I agree that Apple must be thinking it's about as revolutionary as the iPod was. So I guess it's more than just an iPod phone, which is not to say that a phone is not part of the news.
But I think they essentially have finally found a solution for the use and distribution of digital video, which makes more sense if you take the "here we go again"-formulation from Apple into account, and all the hints from Jobs during the past years about the promises and limitations of digitally distributing video. |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
iTunes may be up for a name change. |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Come waste your time with me |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
We could see the iTunes interface become the dashboard widget.
My guess is iTunes stays and iVideo/iWatch/iSee comes into view. Seeing as iTunes was the spawner of Spotlight and iPhoto, why not iVideo spawning off too? After all, it is basically a media subset database, search and consume tool. This means one may have to have a separate AMS (Apple Media Store) interface for both, and/or that iTunes accesses the sounds and iVideo accesses the other content via iVideo Media Store iVMS...sorry, could not resist. |
Posting Rules | Navigation |
Page 5 of 8 Previous 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apple plans "special event" on Sep. 7 (S.E. banter) | psmith2.0 | Speculation and Rumors | 37 | 2005-09-05 22:51 |
iPod Evaluation | Messiahtosh | Apple Products | 14 | 2005-01-18 13:36 |
BMW+iPod=Official | propellerhead | Apple Products | 6 | 2004-06-22 19:07 |
*CONFIRMED* There is an Apple PDA!! And other musings. | HOM | General Discussion | 9 | 2004-06-08 20:04 |
Apple livid over Toshiba iPod leak | curiousuburb | Speculation and Rumors | 11 | 2004-06-05 17:49 |